It's not going to affect the nature of , the nature of Chinese growth up until now has been to see some kind of a market opportunity. Invest in there somebody early on makes a lot of money. Then a whole lot of people come in and then you have over-investment in that industry and this cycle is the case whether it's real estate, stock market, ginko leaves and on and on and on. Some of these guys are going to get burned, the real estate guys, and the export guys, and then they'll identify another opportunity and they'll be back into it. So, I think they cycle will stay the same. 

It depends now if the Chinese government can find the economic management tools. Because, right now, they're sort of in a middle place, where it's not a socialist economy, so five year plan, command and control, price controls for example which the Chinese government have tried to use or demanding soybean producers to increase their output. These are old socialist system economic management tools. They tried them and nobody would listen, they don't work. And on the other side you have the capitalist management tools where you have money supply and interest rates and the Chinese government has manipulated money supply and interest rates and they don't work either. So, China is right in between these two things. Kind of like a ship bobbing in the sea with no rudder. But eventually they'll get more towards the capitalist system where those kind of economic tools work.

So I would guess, the boom and bust are the over-invest and the under-invest and the make lots of money and the don't make lost of money. This cycle has been going on for 20 years, that'll keep on going, Chinese government will probably be able to manage the economy better so they can narrow down those cycles. I think you've seen that in more mature economies, like Europe for example, the highs are not so high and the lows are not so low. Eventually China will get there.